Thursday, April 03, 2025

A special late arvo Liberation Day celebration, refracted through reptile eyes ...


This being Liberation Day, the pond felt a wild surge of excitement and decided to track the reptile reaction.

At first it seemed like bad news ...



Never mind Uncle "Cheesehead" Leon doing a Cheshire Cat routine, the news from the Nine rags was also gloomy ...



Elsewhere in the world the reaction seemed ominous ... these were the early moments at WaPo and the NY Times...





Everybody wanted to feature the stage prop featured in the reality TV star's ongoing show ...



At first, the reptiles sent out a minor player, Cameron Stewart to handle the news, and he went into a witchdoctor-induced depression, lasting all of three minutes, or so the reptiles said ...

Trump’s voodoo tariffs from the Witchdoctor-in-chief will hurt all Australians, Ten per tariffs aside, Australia’s economy, businesses, jobs and opportunity will be hit far harder by the broad global pain which Trump has inflicted on our major trading partners and on the global trading system.

Cam felt shafted ...President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he would impose a 10% baseline tariff on all imports to the United States and higher duties on some of the country's biggest trading partners, in a move that ratchets up a trade war that he kicked off on his return to the White House.



Cam lashed out...

The utterly unwarranted 10 per cent across-the-board tariffs which Donald Trump has slapped on Australian exports to the US is the least of the pain which we will feel from Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ trade war.
Australia’s economy, businesses, jobs and opportunity will ultimately be hit far harder by the broad global pain which Trump has inflicted on our major trading partners and on the global trading system. Add to that the genuine risk that the fallout could trigger a market rout and even usher in a global recession and it’s not an exaggeration to say that we have witnessed one of the darkest days in world trade in our lifetime.
Trump chose to levy far higher tariffs than many economists were expecting, including 34 per cent for China, 26 per cent for India, 24 per cent for Japan and as well as a ten per cent across the board tariff on all US imports for countries like Australia.
Trump chose not to exempt Australia despite the fact that we are not even remotely a bad trading partner with the US, given that Australia is one of the few countries with a trade surplus with America and a free-trade agreement.
It was further evidence, if any was needed, that Trump pays little or no heed to the notion of alliances, loyalty or friendship with his tariff policy – just ask Canada – or even with his approach to global security – just ask Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky.

The reptiles showed the mango Mussolini in action, Donald Trump holds a signed executive order on tariffs. Picture: AP.



Cam was determined to be upset, to an almost unholy reptile degree ...

Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs fundamentally change America’s relationship with the world. It will hurt Australia’s relationship with our closest ally and will reinforce the voices of those calling for a recalibration of the foreign, security and economic relationship with Trump’s Washington.
Trump may only be president for the next four years, but the protectionist wall he has built for friends and foes will lead to similar walls being built around the globe – a bleak outcome for a middle power like Australia which relies on free markets for its trading prosperity.
Trust in international affairs takes years to build and when broken like this, cannot be rebuilt overnight when broken. So Trump’s tariff wall and his approach to global affairs will damage the so-called rules based order well beyond the term of his presidency.
Trump’s tariffs are a cruel trick wrought upon the most vulnerable Americans who do not understand that they will hurt them more than anyone because they will pay higher prices for goods imported into the US. It will lead to inflation from a president who was elected on a promise to reduce prices.
Trump has concealed this ugly truth from ordinary American workers by packaging it up with the pretty bow of nationalism, saying it will lead to American jobs and factories ‘roaring back.’
Nothing is final with Trump and he has made it clear he is open to negotiations over these tariff levels – a sign that he will leverage them for other outcomes.
Yet these new tariffs on many countries are so large, that it is hard to see Trump walking away from them entirely.

That chart provided an AV distraction, as you'd expect from a reality TV star,  Trump shares chart showing reciprocal tariff discounts taking effect



It was all voodoo to the shafted Cam ...

The ultimate check for Trump on these tariffs in the short term will be global markets. No modern president has attached more importance to Wall St than Trump, who frequently boasted about its strength during his first presidential term. The market has been battered so far during his presidency, largely over his tariff policy and also by the general chaos of his administration.
If Wall St continues to plunge in the months ahead, you can expect Trump to take moves to temper the extent of these Liberation Day tariffs.
But there is no sugar coating what Trump has done to the world trading system. He has targeted America’s friends and foes with massive punitive tariffs on the false premise that they will make America great again.
It is voodoo economics which will hurt all Australians and Trump has sadly appointed himself as the witchdoctor-in-chief.

Luckily cooler heads prevailed, and relief was at hand however as the reptiles delivered updated news just before noon ...



The Duttonator was consulted and at first he had sounded gloomy ...

Peter Dutton says it is a “bad day for our country” and the US imposition of tariffs on Australian goods is “not the treatment Australians deserve”.
“We have a very trusted, long-standing and abiding relationship with the United States,” the Opposition Leader said.
“It spans 100 years and we have fought alongside and with the Americans in every major battle over that period of time.
“We have a special relationship with the United States and it hasn’t been treated with respect by the administration or by the President and the question now is what do we do to resolve this matter and to do it quickly?
“It’s clear to me that in the language that’s come out of the administration that there is a discussion to take place and it needs to take place as a matter of urgency because, as prime minister, I want to make sure that we can help our beef producers, make sure that we can help our manufacturers, grow our industry and increase employment in this country and we can do that through a normalised relationship in a trading sense with the United States and obviously to expand other markets, which is exactly what a Coalition government does and has a priority and always has had.”

The bouffant one was quickly on hand to see dark forces at work ...

Trade grenade manna from heaven for PM’s poll hopes, Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton
Anthony Albanese has swiftly sought to maximise the political impact of Donald Trump’s tariff announcement.
By Dennis Shanahan

...The details of the economic and trade impacts will take some time to work out – it’s not clear to what extent beef exports will be affected – and only last week Treasury said in the budget that the reciprocal tariffs would have a modest impact on Australian trade because only 5 per cent of our goods go to the US.
But Labor’s hoped-for political impact will be immediately apparent.
Albanese is seeking to use Trump as a vast distraction to the domestic economic and political scene, and has been painting Peter Dutton as a “friend” of Trump for some time.
Of course, Albanese’s calling out of Trump as a danger to the world’s trade is a lot easier than calling out Xi Jinping over China’s trade war with Australia, its military aggression and dropping our WTO claims against Beijing over dumping of steel in our market.
The basic issue here is to what extent Australian voters decide the US tariffs from Liberation Day are a greater threat to their cost-of-living than rising energy prices, higher interest rates, mortgage costs, fuel prices and threat of government spending and policies which threaten another round of inflation and even lower productivity than the past two years.
An external threat is manna from heaven for a leader who has lost popularity and credibility on key issues.
The timing — during an election campaign — is perfect for Albanese.

Damn you mango Mussolini, but the Duttonator quickly worked out who was really at fault and who should cop all the blame ...

PM 'missing in action' on tariffs: Libs, Noah Yim
Peter Dutton has accused Anthony Albanese of being “weak and missing in action” and has placed blame on the Prime Minister for the “position we’re in today”.

Yes, it's absolutely nothing to do with the Cantaloupe Caligula, it's all the fault of Albo ...

“The Prime Minister didn’t know anything about it (the tariffs),” the Opposition Leader said.
“It was first made known to him when it was publicly announced.
“So that talks about the influence that the Prime Minister has in relation to this matter.
“I can say this much – I want success in the relationship but it’s not going to happen if the Prime Minister finds out about things through the press. There needs to be proper negotiation and consultation.”
Mr Dutton said he had the “strength of leadership and the experience to be able to stand up and fight for us, for our country, whether it’s in relation to our national interests in the trading space, in the national security space or elsewhere”.
“The Prime Minister has been weak and missing in action and that’s why we find ourselves in the position we’re in today,” he said.
“The Prime Minister has a pathway to an outcome here that can see a better final position for the relationship and for our country. But that has not been pursued so far.”
He said Mr Albanese must do “everything he can” to talk to President Trump in light of the tariffs announcement.
“The Prime Minister hasn’t been able to get a call or a meeting with President Trump, but that needs to change and he needs to do everything he can to leverage the ambassador and others to get the relationship normalised,” the Opposition Leader said.
“It’s obvious that the Prime Minister didn’t know anything about this announcement until it was actually released to the press, which also speaks to the state of the relationship at the moment. So I want to make sure that we can, as quickly as possible, resolve this matter.”

Amazing how a gigantic suck can move so seamlessly to sucking on a gigantic scale ...

Apparently we're supposed to forget all that went before ... to borrow that Wilcox 'toon again that had featured earlier ...



The pond didn't understand why the reptiles bothered with the mutton Dutton.

Nor could the pond appreciate some of the cheap humour doing the rounds ...



You can't let those bloody penguins get away with it or the next thing you know, George Miller will want to do a sequel, and there'll be endless squawking and cavorting ...




The Cantaloupe Caligula confronted the cheeky, uppity penguins about their saucy insouciance (the poley bears on Jan Mayen island are almost just as bad and deserve their 10% tariff) ...




Luckily the reptiles knew how to put an end to the nonsense.

With Australia close to the penguin folly, they had Mein Gott on hand to handle the fall-out and the pond immediately knew all would be well ...

How Australia can use US tariffs to its advantage by focussing on defence, It’s vital that Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton do not turn this into a ‘who can hit Trump the hardest’ competition but rather look at how we can turn it to our advantage.

Mein Gott reflexively went into pandering mode, doing the giant suck ... but first there came an AV distraction, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the country would continue to push for President Trump to remove the tariffs he announced earlier in the day.



Mein Gott quickly hit his stride ...

Australia and the rest of the world have been anticipating being hit with higher tariffs since Donald Trump began his presidential election campaign. Naturally, we will and must express our strong opposition to what the US has done.
But we will be drowned out in a chorus of international opposition, particularly from Asian countries who now have much higher tariffs than Australia.
It’s vital that Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton do not turn this into a “who can hit Trump the hardest” competition but rather look at how we can turn it to our advantage.
To help guide the nation I sought advice from a person who is respected in the trade area by both political parties: former trade minister Andrew Robb. He put together many of the free trade agreements that we now enjoy.

Andrew Robb! What a relief ...

I concluded that after our initial strong expressions of opposition, we might view April 3, 2025 as Liberation Day for Australia just as the US President has declared it Liberation Day for the USA. As I explain below, the beef situation is different.
To see April 3 as Liberation Day for Australia we need to first understand that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has made it very clear that the issue of tariffs, which was a central part of the President’s election policy manifesto, is quite separate from defence considerations.
That means Australia is liberated because the ANZUS defence alliance with the US becomes separate from what we do on the trade front.

Yes, we're truly liberated, and at this point the reptiles laboriously replicated that tariff board seen above, and then took credit for the graphic...

You could read the full list on The Hill ...

Or you could admire the short-hand X-rated version ...



So the reptile list was a huge waste of space, and rather than replicate it, the pond quickly reverted to Mein Gott and the Robbster ...

We should continue talking to the US about tariffs and beef but it’s time to take advantage of that liberation and develop a much more active role in regional trade.
And it’s here that I sought the advice of Andrew Robb and he has put forward a strategy for both our political leaders.
“We should shine a huge light on our fundamental opposition to returning to a closed world of elite narcissism where the large and the strong do what they will, and the small and weak suffer what they must,” he says.
“We could and should make an unequivocal statement of where we stand by initiating a bold free trade initiative to combine the TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership) and the RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) Free Trade Agreements to create one truly Asia/Pacific Free Trade Zone.”
Australia, Brunei, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, and Vietnam are in both agreements. Cambodia, China, Indonesia, South Korea, Laos, Myanmar, the Philippines and Thailand, are only in the RCEP while Canada, Chile Mexico Peru and the United Kingdom are only in the TPP.
India is in neither agreement but we have a trade agreement with India which puts us in a rare position of advantage in the region.

Mein Gott had no beef,  Our beef industry will have boundless safety reasons as to why US beef should not be allowed into Australia. Picture: Zoe Phillips



Mein Gott kept on with his cunning planning ... he's the burger king of cleverness ...

I think Robb is right that by bringing the two agreements together we will boost both the region and Australia’s position within the region.
It would obviously be more effective if India also joined but that may be later. The US should be invited even though at this point under its current trade policy it would not accept.
There will be tensions with the US because China, as a member of the RCEP, would be a leading player. But thanks to Rubio we have been invited to keep defence alliances and trade agreements separate - ie we have been liberated.
And let’s keep beef separate. The beef industry will have boundless safety reasons as to why US beef should not be allowed into Australia.
But with a few extra safeguards the real reason becomes that we are protecting our beef industry. The President is right.
On the other hand, America needs our beef in its hamburger industry partly because we help insulate it against droughts and other local forces impacting US domestic beef production.
But more importantly we are integrated into the US hamburger industry.
The US focuses on highly profitable grain fed beef production for both local and export markets. It claims that it only imports beef “from countries that have gone through a rigorous USDA audit process and have proven that their food safety systems are equivalent to ours”.
By blending the higher fat content of US beef trimmings with Australian lean beef it lowers the cost of hamburgers and maintains the favour.
Theoretically, the US could replace Australian beef with local beef but it’s much more profitable to sell US beef on the export market than use it in local hamburgers.
Of course that may change if US beef is excluded from its export markets.
We are being invited by the US President to discuss beef and we should take up the invitation. It will give us the opportunity to explain that we are taking advantage of his tariffs in our region to involve ourselves more deeply in regional trade, while taking advantage of the Rubio declaration.

Why, it's a win-winning, there's so much winning in the fertile imagination of Mein Gott ... and never mind that in his fantasy island, he seems unaware that there's a giant toddler being given free rein to rule like a king ...

Then came an epic Groan, designed to put Mein Gott in the shade...

Trump thinks he holds the winning cards, but reality is complicated, While it’s true that countries cheat, fudge and manipulate – gosh, even the US does this – trade between countries offers win-win outcomes that improve global living standards.
US President Donald Trump announcing the reciprocal tariffs at the White House. Picture: AFP
This article contains features which are only available in the web version, Take me there

In short ...


Surprisingly Dame Groan hadn't listened to Mein Gott explaining the tremendous upside and was sad ...

Donald Trump might call it Liberation Day, but it’s a sad day for the international trading system. While it’s true that countries cheat, fudge and manipulate – gosh, even the US does this – trade between countries offers win-win outcomes that improve global living standards.
The best approach would be to tackle the weaknesses of international trade rather than the US impose unilateral tariffs, with rates varying according to reasonably cack-handed assessments of tariff and non-tariff barriers countries impose on the US.
But Donald Trump’s win-lose view of world trade has led to where we are now. On the face of it, Australia has got off lightly, with a proposed tariff of 10 per cent, the lowest on offer.
Our beef trade is singled out for special mention because we don’t import US beef for biosecurity reasons. Whether these reasons are fully justified is not entirely clear, but the way forward would be for the US to seek some clarification (and transparency) for the ban.
What is of greater concern is the relatively high tariffs being imposed on China, our largest trading partner by a country mile. It’s not certain at this stage whether the announced tariff rate is in addition to the tariffs that already apply to Chinese exports to the US.

There was an AV distraction, President Donald Trump has announced a 10% tariff on Australian exports during his ‘Liberation Day’ speech, citing Australia’s longstanding ban on American beef imports. The move is likely to escalate trade tensions between the two countries.



The Groaner thought about fighting back, but didn't have the ticker ...

There is a possibility that the countries hit by Trump’s new tariffs will fight back. There is a possibility, for example, that China and other nearby countries, including possibly Australia, could form a free trade bloc, which could be quite harmful to the US. China and the EU are already in conversation about the possibility of forming a trade alliance.
In other words, Trump might think that he is holding all the winning cards, but the reality is more complicated.
This extends to what happens to exchange rates. Imposing tariffs drives up a local currency, the reverse of what Trump is seeking.
When tariffs were imposed on China during the first Trump and Biden administrations, the net effect was to see an appreciation of the US dollar and a depreciation of the renminbi. To be sure, the US received the tariff revenue, but the impact on trade was muted because of the offsetting impact of the currency movements.
The idea that Trump’s actions can be contested in the World Trade Organisation, something that the Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, is considering, is fanciful. Apart from the fact that the WTO is barely functional, these types of cases take a long time to conclude. It’s also not clear that the US would take any notice of the final decision.
The more likely outcome is that the world will simply have to wait until the negative effects on US industry and consumers become more apparent. It is at this point that the volatile president could easily change his mind. The impact on the sharemarket is also an important consideration. Were the Dow Jones index to fall significantly, for instance, then there is likely to some rethink of the strategy.
Anticipating the impact on car prices, there has already been an announcement by the Trump administration of full tax deductibility of interest on car loans, which would have the effect of offsetting, at least in part, the tariff hit to consumers. Recall that the soy bean producers who were badly affected by the earlier tariff imposed on China were showered with subsidies to offset the impact.

(At this point the reptiles repeated their list of tariffs, but missed out on vital ones like the 50% on Saint Pierre and Miquelon, the punishment of the ruffians on the Falkland Islands - 41% - the emasculation of the felons of Norfolk Island - 29% - and Nauru - 30% - and the degutting of perhaps the most terrifying and threatening country of all - Tokelau - 10%).

Dame Groan carried on with her groaning, not entirely convinced of the wisdom foisted on the world by her kissing cousins at Faux Noise:

This raises the issue of the net impact on revenue for the US which, on the face of it, is a driving force behind Liberation Day. To the extent that the administration is forced to compensate US businesses and consumers, the all-up gain in revenue will be much less than anticipated. Even under the most optimistic scenarios, the gain in revenue is small relative to income tax revenue, for instance.
Having said this, there is really no chance that Trump will change his mind on tariffs, at least in the short term. He simply refuses to believe that tariffs are the equivalent of taxes, the burden off which falls mainly on low-income people. And ultimately tariffs are ineffective at encouraging investment in import-competing industries, something that Australia finally came to realise.
zthis is not to deny that there may be geo-strategic reasons for thinking about trade policy – targeted tariffs or bans, even, can make sense to ensure guaranteed supplies of critical goods. But Trump’s Liberation Day is something else: it’s a scattergun approach that will come unstuck over time. In the meantime, other countries will react in varying ways, including imposing tit-for-tat tariffs on US imports while also setting up competing trading blocs.
Australia is best placed to keep its power dry, rule out imposing reciprocal tariffs and wait. Entering into dialogues with these other countries, as well as the US, also makes sense.

Golly, that's all she Groaned?

Did Mein Gott have the best zany solutions of all?

In all the fuss, the pond almost forgot to mention a two minute outing by the WSJ Editorial Board, faithfully reproduced by the reptiles, The MAGA backlash arrives, The Democrats’ victory in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election is a warning to Republicans that the Trump-Musk governing style could cost them control of Congress next year.

So much winning ... Elon Musk listens as US President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 11.


Winning hugely ...

Democrats solidified their 4-3 progressive majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday, and the ramifications are nationwide. The comfortable win by Democratic Judge Susan Crawford is the second sign in two weeks of a political backlash against the Trump Presidency.
Democrats turned out in large numbers to defeat Republican Judge Brad Schimel in a race in which the two sides may have spent as much as $100 million. Democrats sought to make the race a referendum on Elon Musk and Donald Trump, and Mr Musk responded by trying to mobilise the Trump voters who tend to stay home in spring elections. The Democratic bet paid off.
That’s a warning to the GOP that the Trump-Musk governing style is stirring a backlash that could cost them control of Congress next year. All the more so given the results in two special House races in Florida Tuesday to replace a pair of Republicans.
These are safe seats, and Republicans won the western Panhandle district held by Matt Gaetz with some room to spare. But Jimmy Patronis’s 57 per cent was about nine points less than the 66 per cent that Mr Gaetz won in 2024. It was a similar story in the Palm Coast seat of former Rep. Mike Waltz, who is now Mr Trump’s national security adviser.
Democrats had a better candidate, but the swing to Democrats was about nine points from Mr Waltz’s 66.5 per cent vote share in 2024 to state Sen. Randy Fine’s roughly 57 per cent on Tuesday. Democrats are fired up to make a statement about Mr Trump’s polarising second term. Last week they flipped a Pennsylvania state Senate seat long held by the GOP.

The winning never stopped, Wisconsin's Supreme Court will keep its narrow liberal majority after Dane County Circuit Judge Susan Crawford eased to victory in one of the most closely watched state judicial races in yea …



Or was this just another WSJ FAFO moment?

Republicans can console themselves that they held the Florida seats and thus their narrow House majority. And we hope the results don’t scare House Republicans into backing away from their tax and regulatory reform agenda. That’s what Democrats would love, so next year they’d get the benefit both ways — motivated Democrats and sullen Republicans after a GOP governing failure.
But the elections are a warning to Mr Trump to focus on what got him re-elected — especially prices and growth in real incomes after inflation. His willy-nilly tariff agenda undermining stock prices and consumer and business confidence isn’t helping.
As for Wisconsin, Republicans in that state will now have to live with a wilful Supreme Court majority that could reverse nearly everything the GOP accomplished under former Gov. Scott Walker. School vouchers, collective-bargaining reform for public workers, tort reform and more are likely to be challenged in lawsuits by the left. Congressional district electoral maps will also be challenged and could cost the GOP two House seats.
The MAGA majority may have a shorter run than advertised.
The Wall St Journal

Oh yes, there'll be huge winning....



Finally on this freedumb day, a friend sent along a link to a piece from Germany's Zeid.de, by Von Florian Illies, Thanks America, That’ll Be All, Andy Warhol, Big Mac, iPhone: It was a grand American epoch. But it’s over. Europe must finally emancipate itself – just not as awkwardly as Jürgen Habermas might like.

It was a vale and an elegy, but there also seemed to be a lot of winning ...

Thank you for Andy Warhol. Thank you for the Big Mac and the iPhone. Thank you, too, for Francis Ford Coppola, for Stanley Kubrick and Quentin Tarantino. Thank you for Angela Davis, Joan Mitchell and Susan Sontag. Thank you for F. Scott Fitzgerald, for Aretha Franklin, Edward Hopper and also for Levi’s 501s. And now: Goodbye.

(Indeed, indeed, each day the pond says a silent prayer of thanks for the opportunity to watch Megalopolis and read a Sontag novel).

Yes, it was a grand American epoch, one that afforded us here in Europe with a hundred years of security, pleasure and stimulation. But every good thing must come to an end. Now, we can finally abandon our meek submission. We no longer have to skittishly acquiesce to each new crazed impulse from the prepotent, red-tied occupants of the White House. We must no longer listen, wide-eyed with horror, as the American vice president terminates our friendship. We don’t have to immediately contract the flu when someone in America coughs. In 1925, one-hundred years ago, the Americans gave us The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Manhattan Transfer by John Dos Passos, Hemingway’s first short stories, Josephine Baker’s first dance. America gave the world the first motel and the magazine The New Yorker. And it went on like that for ten decades.
The spirit of the age found a home in America, and the west wind reliably blew all the benefits and aberrations of capitalism across the Atlantic, every new music style, every new art genre, every new student movement, every new take on the world. But now that lunacy has installed itself in Washington for the next four years, the time has finally come for Europe to once again try its hand at hosting the spirit of the age. After all, that arrangement worked out rather well for the 2000 years before Hemingway and the Big Mac.
A brief reminder: When the Europeans conquered the American continent in the early 16th century, at a time when coyotes and grizzlies were still bidding each other good night where New York and Los Angeles would later appear – Raphael, Michelangelo and Leonardo were feverishly drawing, painting and building the Medici’s Florence, the spiritual center of the world. And this High Renaissance was itself just a "rebirth" of the venerated advanced civilizations of Greek and Roman antiquity a couple thousand years earlier.
We have, in other words, a slightly larger slice of the cultural history pie than the North Americans. And yes, it is, in fact, astounding just how fast they were able to catch up in the 19th century and cruise on past in the 20th century – technically, militarily and culturally. But now the time has come to stop obsessing about the humiliations from the New World and reflect on our own roots and strengths here in the Old World.
Never forget: Coffee existed even before Starbucks. And the computer was invented by Konrad Zuse, not Steve Jobs. The best books by Fitzgerald, Hemingway and Susan Sontag are set in Europe, Andy Warhol’s mother comes from the Carpathians, Bill Gates collects French impressionists, and the director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art is from Vienna.
Since World War II, the European – and particularly the German – perception of the U.S. has always been a bit schizophrenic. As deeply objectionable as the McCarthy era, the Vietnam War and the Iraq invasion were, everything cultural and pop-cultural produced by America’s liberal universities, publishing houses, film and record studios was eagerly and reverently snapped by Europeans over the course of several decades. The products from America were usually a bit more original, more fun, more sophisticated – and simply better.
Now, though, with the administration of Donald Trump, it’s not just American politics that is appalling, more appalling than ever before. Consumerism has also lost its shine, as it, too, seems infected by the Trumpian specter of illiberalism. It is spreading like an infectious disease. Those who use Instagram know that Mark Zuckerberg has kowtowed to Trump, those who order something from Amazon know that Jeff Bezos invited the president to his wedding – and every Tesla driver wants to punch the steering wheel every morning because their erstwhile mobile testament to coolness and climate awareness has suddenly become an enabler for Elon Musk’s chainsaw-wielding fever dream. It seems as if everything American has suddenly lost its innocence. Only the brave, recalcitrant journalists from the New York Times, the New Yorker and the Atlantic have not yet fallen under the broad veil of suspicion.

The New York Times? Brave, recalcitrant journalists?

Oh dear he was doing so well up to that moment, but at least the pond now understands what both siderism means in Germany.

Apparently a literal translation would be ... beides Siderismus

Alas and alack, according to at least one English dictionary this only adds to the confusion that the hacks at the NY Times foist on the world in their constant attempts to present both sides of the picture, giving Satan his due while dissing on the angels...




So it goes ...and what a glorious Liberation Day, full of fun for all ...




In which there's some talk of cheeseheads, King Donald the messiah, and nuking the country to save the planet ...

 

Who's a cheesehead now?



It's left to the likes of The Bulwark to enjoy tales of A Wakeup Call in Wisconsin ... and there's also Rattled Trump Says Elon Musk Is on the Way Out, The Tesla billionaire is returning to his businesses, according to the president. (paywall, but the header says it all. See also Changing his Tune)

The stench of Musk and Tesla receding, the pond must tend to the lizards of Oz, but even the reptiles felt the weighty presence of King Donald, with the lead story early in the morning this day ...

Rival leaders in race to benefit from Trump bump
Anthony Albanese is poised for a showdown with Donald Trump if sweeping tariffs are slapped on Australian goods, with the government considering WTO action, as Peter Dutton pledges to ‘stand up’ to the US President.
By Geoff Chambers, Jack Quail and Ben Packham




The reptiles held out hope against hope ...

LIVE Politics Now
Trump open to tariffs deal, dangles a 50pc discount
With Australian exporters bracing for US tariffs on $23.9bn worth of goods,  one insider has suggested the US President may be willing to negotiate over his April 2 tariffs, offering a 50 per cent discount to some ­nations.
By Joe Kelly and Noah Yim

A discount! 

But wasn't the Duttinator going to take him down? Of course the cartoonists had tremendous fun with the notion of the mutton Dutton standing up to King Donald, including the infallible Pope...



Over at Crikey, the keen Keane noted Dutton has flirted pathetically with Trump. On ‘Liberation Day’, the honeymoon is over, Peter Dutton is unable to help himself in constantly offering Trump-style policies. But if Trump launches another economic attack on Australia, where can he run? (archive link)

Inter alia:

...Labor was and is refusing to “offer a running commentary” on Trump, anxious to avoid upsetting the toddler-in-chief, but since the campaign has started the government has been happy to link Dutton to the US, if not directly to Trump. Expect that to only increase in the wake of “Liberation Day” if key Australian sectors are hurt.
And while that’s happening, Dutton has given Labor another gift in the form of a Trump-style commitment to shutter the federal Department of Education, an idea that could have come straight from Project 2025.
It’s another stumble in a campaign start so poor that Dutton is already, just a few days in, promising colleagues that he will lift his game. Bizarrely, it looks like the start of the election caught the Coalition by surprise, despite it being the most heavily teased election in decades. Dutton’s signature nuclear policy — which clearly landed poorly in the Coalition’s internal polling — has had to be binned in favour of a gas reservation policy. Yesterday’s debacle in Victoria — where an announcement to cut funding from the Suburban Rail Loop (an excellent idea) and shift it to the Tullamarine rail link (a terrible idea) was inexplicably held in a vineyard — suggests inexperienced and poor-quality staff are making important decisions.
Dutton has repeatedly emphasised in his backgrounding to journalists that he’s no Trump. But publicly, he keeps trying to sound like Trump and offer policies like Trump. It doesn’t matter what press gallery journalists believe, only what voters think. And, having worked to align himself with the mad king, Dutton may find himself unable to escape the long shadow Trump is casting over this campaign.

Put it another way, per the willing Wilcox ...



The pond loves the smell of a cartoon in the morning, while the reptiles tried to batter the Teals, and this splendid effort by Natasha fell into the digital void...

Exclusive
No woke syllabus for us: Catholic schools
Catholic schools have called for the ‘ideological’ national curriculum to be abolished, as new research reveals more boys are slipping behind girls in their academic performance.
By Natasha Bita

That bloody Jesus and his woke ways. No room for him in the church of tykes.

Elsewhere, also lost in the void, the reptiles did show a dim awareness that things might be kinda funny with the climate ...

Flood of the century unleashes heartache across the outback
Outback Queensland’s flood of the century has descended into a human and financial disaster for far-flung communities, beef stations and vast sheep runs as stock losses pile up and emergency services scramble to save people from the rising waters.
By Jamie Walker, Mackenzie Scott and Elodie Jakes

(But naturally there was no sighting of a mention of the seas pounding Sydney).

Over on the extreme far right of the rag, the pond felt particularly safe in ignoring petulant Peta this day. She was trying to flog the Duttonator over the finish line ...

Forget polls, election clash is just getting started
The Coalition has to better sheet home to voters who is responsible for their pain. Under Labor’s watch our living standards have dropped 8 per cent – the worst in the developed world.
By Peta Credlin
Columnist

She was top of the reptile digital world, ma ...



... but petulant Peta's prominence could be explained by looking down the list.

What a motley bunch, what a crew of riff-raffs and ne'er do wells...

Once upon a time the pond could have turned to the savvy Savva, but she's over in the Nine rags, scribbling Wakey, wakey: Dutton looks shaky as his aptitude is put to the ultimate test, The opposition leader has made a lot of mistakes since January, and they are beginning to catch up with him. (archive link)

For those keen to wander down the archived Savva memory lane, this is a teaser...

...Albanese, and Dutton especially – who has gushed over Trump and continues to ape his policies – have nothing to lose if they go in hard against him. How will Trump punish us? By scrapping AUKUS? Please. Make our day.
Malcolm Turnbull is right. No slumping to our knees, no sucking up. Allowing Trump to think it’s OK to treat Australia as an enemy rather than as a friend is not on.
Nor is it OK for a prime ministerial aspirant from Queensland to spit on the capital of the nation he wants to lead while expressing his preference to live in a harbourside mansion in Sydney.

Oh dear, perhaps that explains why Jack the Insider went all whimsical with ...

What’s the half-life of a nuclear policy kerfuffle anyway?
Have you seen the Coalition’s nuclear policy? Have a good rummage around. Try to retrace your steps. Maybe it has fallen between the couch cushions?
Jack the Insider
Columnist

Gerard Baker of the WSJ was also on view, which reminded the pond that it hadn't noted a classic bit of WSJ Editorial Board FAFO relating to RFK Jr., which ran a few days ago 

RFK Jr. Is Already Vindicating His Critics, Shrinking HHS makes sense, but giving power to antivaccine crusader David Geier doesn’t. (archive link)

The archive had the opening snap of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Friday, but the pond wanted to dive straight away into the FAFO ...

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been secretary of Health and Human Services for all of six weeks, but he’s already vindicating his critics. First he downplayed a measles outbreak in Texas. Then he reportedly hired a trial-lawyer ally to work on a government study of the link between vaccines and autism. Now he has pushed out a top Food and Drug Administration official because he helped accelerate approval of the Covid vaccines.
Mr. Kennedy grabbed headlines on Thursday by proposing to consolidate sundry HHS agencies and cut 20,000 jobs. The bloated department could use some shrinking. Most of his plan, such as refocusing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on its core mission of preparing for and responding to infectious disease outbreaks, isn’t radical.
What is disturbing are news reports that Mr. Kennedy has tapped David Geier, a longtime vaccine critic, to assist with a CDC study of vaccines and autism. The White House hasn’t confirmed the reports, but HHS lists Mr. Geier in its staff directory as a “senior data analyst.”
Mr. Geier has spent decades spreading the discredited theory, embraced by Mr. Kennedy, that thimerosal in vaccines causes autism and neurological damage in children. He has published more than a dozen studies that trial lawyers have cited as evidence of vaccines’ harms, though they have been rejected by judges and the government’s special vaccine courts.
Mr. Geier has also accused the CDC of concealing vaccine safety data and claimed that better nutrition and hygiene—not vaccines—are responsible for the disappearance of deadly infectious diseases. If Mr. Kennedy truly wants an independent, impartial review of vaccine data, Mr. Geier is the wrong man for the job. The study’s results look preordained.
Another concern is that Mr. Kennedy will create a brain drain at HHS as he pushes out scientists who don’t toe his antivaccine line. We warned last month that Mr. Kennedy might try to fire Peter Marks, the head of the FDA biologics division who helped shepherd President Trump's Operation Warp Speed for Covid vaccines in the first term.
On Friday Mr. Marks resigned, which is especially regrettable since he pushed the FDA bureaucracy to accelerate life-saving therapies for children with rare genetic disorders. He also pushed back against those in and outside of the agency, including Biden FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, who fretted that the FDA was approving too many novel drugs with high prices.
Mr. Marks writes in his resignation letter that he was willing to work with Mr. Kennedy to address his “concerns regarding vaccine safety and transparency.” However, he adds, “it has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the Secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.”
Some Senate Republicans hoped that other Trump HHS appointees—e.g., FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya—would keep Mr. Kennedy in check. It isn’t working out that way. NIH is now requiring grants or contracts involving mRNA technology to be reported to Mr. Kennedy’s office. The mRNA platform helped to develop Covid vaccines, and it has shown potential to treat and prevent other diseases including cancer.
Mr. Kennedy rightly criticized the Biden Administration’s Covid responses for ignoring science, but he won’t restore public confidence if he feeds skepticism about vaccines that have saved countless lives. Our worst fears about Mr. Kennedy are coming true.

Speaking of worst fears, is it any wonder then that Baker of the WSJ turned to the divine for help? Apparently the current Messiah wasn't enough for him ...



The pond kids you not, it really does exist...

This book will explain in depth how "Donald John Trump's" full name literally means: "The Ruler of the World, graced by Yahweh (the LORD) and a descendant of a Drummer." Upon reading this book, the reader will be captivated when they realize how President Donald John Trump fulfilled most of the prophecies as the Son of Man. It speaks about End Time Prophecies and Biblical revelations regarding "President Donald J. Trump, the Son of Man. The Christ." (Amazon link only for those wanting to pander to billionaire oligarch Bezos, destroyer of democracy in darkness).

Baker did his best in a three minute read headed Faith, freedom and the long thread of technology, As humanity pushes the boundaries of science and artificial intelligence, God is waiting in the wings.

God is in the wings, She isn't in the White House?

For some reason the reptiles opened with this snap, The Sheldonian Theatre and the Clarendon Building seen through the arch of the Hertford Bridge.



Then Baker began his mystic journey ...

The tension between science and religion has in some ways defined human progress. The steady accumulation of scientific knowledge across millennia has challenged, undermined and, for many, extinguished the idea of some divine infinite creator, a spiritual superhuman that commands our universe.

(The reptiles provided two links for that opener, but being the hive mind, they only led to other bits of the hive mind. The talk of science and religion linked to a February 2016 review by John Carmody of a book by Peter Harrison, while the idea of some divine creator led to that recent Oz fetish about the way that the Pellists performed miracles from beyond the grave. Neither are of any interest, consequence or relevance, save to reveal the way that the reptiles insist everyone stay within the hive mind. Welcome to the hotel lizard Oz, you can never leave).

Back to Baker's journey ...

In this commonly shared view of history as a continuous progression through ascending levels of intelligence, magic gave way to religious belief, which gave way to the scientific method and empiricism.
Mysteries ascribed to the supernatural were discovered to be merely the product of shrinking pockets of ignorance. It was no longer necessary to invent an omniscient God, as Voltaire said in a less enlightened time: science has enabled us to become him.
Yet God – or at least some sense of a supernatural being beyond the compass of the human mind – somehow refuses to die.
The realisation that knowledge itself begets as many questions as answers continues to leave just enough room for faith, as scientific “truths” themselves fall victim to new realities and the rediscovery of the inexplicable.
Sometimes scientific progress enabled rather than eroded religious faith: observation of the intricacy of cell division or the first view of Earth from the moon evinced a new awe at the genius of creation and, for some, a heightened sense of the divine. Now – in more prosaic ways – there are signs that our latest technological innovations are generating new thinking in surprising places about man, faith and God.
There have been murmurings of a religious revival in recent years. Some polling suggests the long steady decline in faith among Americans may have levelled off.
Even in godless Europe there is some evidence of renewed religious interest, and not merely because of the growing population of Muslims.

Oh that's awkward, did he have to mention two long absent lords, the following of either one dooming deniers to an eternity in hellfire? 

The pond was reminded of a joke that could be found in the Graudian ...

Once I saw this guy on a bridge about to jump. I said, "Don't do it!" He said, "Nobody loves me." I said, "God loves you. Do you believe in God?"
He said, "Yes." I said, "Are you a Christian or a Jew?" He said, "A Christian." I said, "Me, too! Protestant or Catholic?" He said, "Protestant." I said, "Me, too! What franchise?" He said, "Baptist." I said, "Me, too! Northern Baptist or Southern Baptist?" He said, "Northern Baptist." I said, "Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist or Northern Liberal Baptist?"
He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist." I said, "Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region, or Northern Conservative Baptist Eastern Region?" He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region." I said, "Me, too!"
Northern Conservative†Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1879, or Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912?" He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912." I said, "Die, heretic!" And I pushed him over.

Hey nonny no, on we go ...

There could be any number of reasons for this turn, but two conversations in the past few months have convinced me that it is in good part the direct result of the technological advances the secular mind has created.
In one of the more unusual events I’ve attended in recent years, on a cold mid-February day in Oxford, I listened as two unlikely prophets of a new spirituality entranced an audience of ambitious young students.
In Christopher Wren’s Sheldonian Theatre, seated aptly under the gaze of Robert Streater’s magnificent ceiling art – “Truth Descending on the Arts and Sciences to Expel Ignorance from the University” – Twitter co-founder Biz Stone and Pinterest co-founder Evan Sharp talked about how their entrepreneurial success at creating the screen-based activity now consuming so much of young people’s minds had turned them into urgent advocates of a renewed appreciation of the divine.
Their conversation was titled Reconnecting with the Sacred in a Technology-Driven World. Illuminated by a sea of candles that evoked an ancient church or a very expensive spa, they talked about the damage done to mental and social health by the ubiquity of social media and technology and how it demanded the reawakening of a fully spiritual humanity.

He's talking to a man who wants to take credit for co-founding what has become veritable cesspool? 

Even worse the reptiles featured a snap of the dude, Biz Stone, co-founder of Twitter. Picture: Jacob Kepler/Bloomberg


Of course you're going to turn to the divine when you see what Uncle Leon has wrought ...

Sharp had an especially profound observation: we think of technology as just things that are new, he said, and when we’ve got used to them we stop calling them technology. But technology is a tool for human development. Structured, ancient institutional religions continue to have meaning; an “unbelievable tapestry of these traditions that are thousands of years old, and what they have, from my perspective, is the most precious technology on earth”.
The second conversation was one I had with a brilliant young entrepreneur in artificial intelligence – the company he founded already has an 11-figure valuation.
Like many in the field, he is focused not just on the opportunity of AI but also on what it will mean for our humanity. AI, he told me recently, will soon create a world in which “intelligence is a commodity”.
If this is true – and I have no reason to challenge the word of such an authority – it has revolutionary implications for what it means to be human.
The entire history of human development can be viewed in some ways as the extraction of the scarce resource of intelligence and its application to human problems. If machines will do all that better and at an infinite rate, what is left for the human mind?
I don’t know, but I suspect part of the answer will be a deeper appreciation for what distinguishes man – and that surely is the existence of a soul, as well as a body and a mind.
In The Queer Feet, GK Chesterton’s becassocked detective hero Father Brown explains how he captured a thief: “I caught him, with an unseen hook and an invisible line which is long enough to let him wander to the ends of the world, and still to bring him back with a twitch upon the thread.”
Chesterton was invoking the idea of God’s continuing, often unrecognised, immanence in our lives; the sense that, however much freedom we may have, however much agency we claim, we are simply spooling out the long thread that attaches us to our maker.
Watching the latest explosion of new technology I reflect that perhaps the whole long march of science, all that secular accumulation of knowledge, is simply the unreeling of that long, seemingly limitless thread, and that eventually we all feel the twitch.
The Wall Street Journal

Being a friendly atheist, the pond doesn't have much to say to twitchers of the Baker kind, and even less to the Sharp kind, which if heated, might cut a little butter, but it does recall this Blake poem ...

"Love seeketh not itself to please,
Nor for itself hath any care,
But for another gives its ease,
And builds a Heaven in Hell's despair."

So sung a little Clod of Clay
Trodden with the cattle's feet,
But a Pebble of the brook
Warbled out these metres meet:

"Love seeketh only self to please,
To bind another to its delight,
Joys in another's loss of ease,
And builds a Hell in Heaven's despite." 

A Hell in Heaven's despite! Put that another way, in the current US context, where King Donald is the new messiah ...


(Daily Kos)

Would the long absent lord begin to recognise the treatment of strangers in the current USA?

The pond supposes it should pay some attention to local activities, and looked to find some Pearls of Wisdom in Peter Dutton needs to do more to smash through this election duopoly, Albanese’s campaign is based on two big lies: one, that wind and solar are the cheapest forms of energy. And two, that Dutton plans to end Medicare.

First came a reminder that it's terribly hard to do a flattering snap, Leader of the Opposition Peter Dutton delivers keynote address at the Menzies Research Centre in Sydney. Picture: Britta Campion



Then it was on with the Pearls ...

How ironic. In the opening days of the election campaign Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton accused our major supermarkets of short-changing the public yet they lead a political duopoly that is guilty of just this.
If you doubt this is the case, consider the policy platforms the Labor Party and the Coalition are offering voters. In many areas they’re barely distinguishable, reflecting an implicit bargain not to disrupt a political equilibrium with which they are both comfortable but one that falls far short of the policy changes the country needs.
The major parties are running a unity ticket on significant fiscal, economic and environmental policy questions. They are both committed to net zero, which will continue to drive up power prices. Both support bracket creep. Neither is prepared to reduce our punishingly high top marginal income tax rates. Neither is prepared to touch the National Disability Insurance Scheme and other unsustainable entitlement programs.

Just as the Pearls were cascading to the ground, the reptiles rudely interrupted with a lying rodent talking to a dog botherer, Former prime minister John Howard shared his thoughts on Opposition Leader Peter Dutton during the lead-up to the federal election. “Strong, purposeful, steady, you want someone who is grounded; you can’t serve almost a decade in the police force without seeing life often at its worst,” Mr Howard told Sky News host Chris Kenny. “My association with and it started when he entered parliament when he successfully defeated Cheryl Kernot and held it through successive elections.”



Well they would say that ...

Nor do the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leader appear to acknowledge the need for painful, politically difficult policy calls to be made in response to pressing economic and security challenges – although Dutton has indicated he will say more about our future defence needs.
In this campaign, productivity – the ultimate determinant of our living standards – is the economic concept that cannot be mentioned. Indeed, by demanding that the Fair Work Commission approve an “above-inflation wage increase” for the millions of employees on awards – and being silent on the need for higher productivity to pay for this – the Albanese government is calling for a new inflationary breakout.
Of course, like any self-respecting corporate duopolists, the major parties give the impression of real competition by talking up a small number of policy differ­ences. Under the heading of cost-of-living support, we have Albanese’s $5 to $10 a week income tax cuts up against Dutton’s $14 a week fuel excise cut. Think Coke v Pepsi. To be fair, Dutton has committed to increase our gas supply and build seven nuclear reactors. This is no small deal. On nuclear, he has not blinked in the face of Labor’s appalling fear campaign and looked like a leader as a result. His refusal to demonise gas and coal – which a renewables-captured ALP cannot help demonising – is a breath of fresh air.
In contrast, Albanese’s campaign is based on two big lies: one, that wind and solar are the cheapest forms of energy (the cost of these is infinitely high for the 60 to 70 per cent of the time weather conditions do not favour them); and two, that Dutton plans to end Medicare.

Ah, the cheapest form of energy and the nuking of the country to save the planet. 

That reminded the pond that Jack the Insider had a few words to say on that matter, what with the keen Keane already noting that it had "clearly landed poorly in the Coalition’s internal polling" ...

Have you seen the Coalition’s nuclear policy? Have a good rummage around. Try to retrace your steps. Maybe it has fallen between the couch cushions? Don’t tell me the dog got a hold of it.
There was an unconfirmed sighting two days ago, as reported in the Bairnsdale Advertiser in East Gippsland, Victoria under the imposing headline, “Coalition Nuclear Policy Unpacked”.
This proved illusory. The Bairnsdale ’Tiser merely chronicled a community meeting held by the East Gippsland Climate Action Network where a spokesman, who isn’t a member of the Coalition but is an engineer, explained the policy and raised several concerns about it.
Last week another breadcrumb on the nuclear energy policy trail was spotted when former Senate candidate for the Nuclear Disarmament Party, occasional harmonicist and environment minister in the Rudd cabinet Peter Garrett wrote an opinion piece for Nine newspapers. Unsurprisingly, he was against it. In the absence of any polemical response from the Coalition, I was left to wonder if Garrett had merely written the piece to publicise the re-release of Hercules – EP on vinyl with two new tracks.
So, where could the Coalition’s nuclear policy be? Furthermore, has the absence of any reference to it been driven by an internal partyroom brawl over the correct pronunciation of nuclear – you say new-clear, I say new-cular, let’s call the whole thing off?
I recall attending a soiree back in June 2024 where several Liberal Party apparatchiks were in attendance just days after the Coalition released its nuclear policy. At the time it was a bare-bones plan to build seven nuclear plants in five states, two small modular nuclear reactors, with a lot of artist’s impressions.
I heard much of the voluble positive chatter from afar. I turned to a mate and offered my opinion: “It’s terrible politics.”
“At least,” my mate said, “it’s got people talking.”
That was 15 months – a political eon ago. Now it appears it is being talked about only in Bairnsdale. Excitable party hacks aside, nuclear energy was always going to be a much harder sell to the Australian people who basically fall into three camps – why not, opposed and damned opposed.
Shortly after the policy was released and right on cue, Paul Keating offered a statement pronouncing his dislike for the policy and offering some free character assessment of Peter Dutton to boot. A walking thesaurus of invective, the former prime minister described the Opposition Leader as “a charlatan – an inveterate climate change denialist. A denialist now seeking to camouflage his long-held denialism in an industrial fantasy – resorting to the most dangerous and expensive energy source on the face of the earth – nuclear power.”
It’s not the most expensive energy source, by the way. That’s good old liquefied natural gas.
There has been more meat applied to the policy since, most of it released during the Christmas rush in 2024. One of the five large-scale reactors, would be firing up at Traralgon’s Loy Yang power station, just 150 clicks from Bairnsdale.
Meanwhile, in the world of realpolitik, perhaps there is a fatalist’s sense that the policy could shift from the theoretical into the actual only if, while in government, the Coalition could garner support to revoke the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Act and federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.
It almost certainly would need the support of crossbenchers in the House of Representatives and in the Senate to do so. The two acts, introduced in the early years of the Howard government, were merely symbolic, designed to ward off political scare campaigns. The black-letter law remains like an albatross around the neck of nuclear energy proponents. But for the sake of argument, I figure a year to overturn those two acts. Then on to the states where required legislative changes are even less likely. Let’s be kind and give that three years.
Then to the sites, with NIMBY protests and environmental impact statements up the wazoo. Even generously, it would mean soil turned on a large-scale nuclear reactor not a day earlier than 2030. From there, 20 years minimum for the build. And that’s only if the Coalition can find the policy first. Win, lose, or draw, the Coalition will be frustrated because Energy Minister Chris Bowen remains wide open to all manner of verbal assaults on Labor’s energy policy, its shortcomings, its shortfalls and its pitfalls.
Without wanting to state the obvious, Bowen, in cricketer’s parlance, is prone to wave the bat outside off. Terrible footwork. Of course, the Coalition’s recent silence on nuclear policy is in direct contrast to millions of households around the country that recoil in horror every time they glimpse their electricity bills.
The greater shame of the disappearing policy is that the nation won’t consider nuclear options for decades, despite some quite stunning advances in small modular reactors. They remain expensive, not only to purchase and assemble but also in projected costs of electricity generation.
We can safely expect improved performance and economies of scale as production gears up in a world that is screaming for zero-carbon technology. Taking that option off the table for the foreseeable smacks of arrogance and bad planning. I expect the door will remain closed on SMRs, only for it to rear up and become another source of political dispute in the middle of the century.
Alas, I don’t expect to be around for that momentous occasion. I’ll be in Bairnsdale looking for the Coalition’s nuclear policy.

The pond regrets having to strip Jack of his illustrative snaps, but the Pearls of Wisdom man was already well cluttered with snaps of villains, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on the campaign trail In Victoria.



Call these Pearls of Wisdom petulant Peta-lite, and you can see why the pond was keen to do a white rabbit and scurry through the rest of them ...

To his credit, Dutton has been prepared to make a partial break with our political duopoly but seems hesitant to go the full way. This caution plays into the hands of Albanese. As we know, since World War II not a single first-term government has been defeated at the polls. Even Gough Whitlam was re-elected in 1974.
By refusing to offer a more compelling alternative to Albanese, Dutton is ignoring this political reality. He may be sending a subliminal message to the electorate – and I have in mind the 40 per cent of disengaged voters our electoral laws compel to turn up at the polls – that Albanese’s economic, fiscal and international policy settings are broadly acceptable. Dutton’s advisers could argue that oppositions offering ambitious policy manifestos inevitably fail.
But I am not calling for a 2025 version of Fightback. A single game-changing announcement can do the trick.
The only requirement is that it forces voters – and the media – to see our current political orthodoxy for what it is: a recipe for long-term national decline. Paul Keating’s much-maligned banana republic comment did just this.
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, a commitment to abolish bracket creep would serve this purpose beautifully. It should be backed up by data showing how much this “inflation tax” has taken out of household budgets since 2022 – which by some estimates is greater than the toll higher interest rates have taken – and the damage it will continue to do under a returned Labor government. With this commitment Dutton would be appealing to voters’ loss aversion, a more powerful psychological incentive than the future benefit of more gas supply offers.
It would put an end to Labor’s taunt that Dutton is not lowering taxes. Getting rid of bracket creep would not cost a great deal in the short term (although the cost rises across time), it would put an automatic check on the growth of spending and it would be a progressive, not regressive, change to our tax system.

Strange, if he'd been Baker, perhaps it would have been a single flash of light descending from the heavens. 

Instead the reptiles relied on an old ploy, yet another revival of an ancient Satan, but all that did was remind the pond that the lizard Oz is now for a very aged demographic. 

Who else would care to see a roughed up snap of Gough?



Why no snap of Billy McMahon? Why no snap of Harold Holt? In their day, they were hot contenders, major players in the game of worst PM of all time...

Because nobody cares. It's all bubble headed influencers these days ...



Oh reptiles of the hive mind, see where print media now stands in the scheme of things?

Talk about irrelevance disappearing into the sunset, talk about the compleat uselessness of these Pearls of wisdom ...

As I have said before, let the election be fought as a referendum on this rather than Labor’s fictitious Medicare fear campaign. Better still, Dutton also should offer substantial personal income tax cuts, but I suspect the policy work simply has not been done.
A possible alternative to bracket creep reform, or an addition to it, would be to announce a substantial, specific and urgent increase in the defence budget in response to our rapidly deteriorating security environment. With the recent Chinese warship visit fresh in people’s minds, the electorate would be more than open to this. Again, such an announcement would put Labor in a difficult position, forcing it on to electoral ground it does not want to fight on – and exposing Labor’s instinctive anti-defence stance to full view.
No one can predict how election campaigns will unfold. Despite recent polling, Dutton could well win on the basis of his current agenda for change. Having worked on an election campaign long ago, I know how significant an ill-advised handshake, an unscripted comment to a voter or a costing black hole can prove to be in a tight contest.
Perhaps Dutton still may have a major policy card up his sleeve, as he has been hinting. His risk-averse advisers may be telling him not to play it, but for oppositions seeking to unseat first-term governments playing it safe is risky in itself. In short, Dutton needs to do more to challenge the foundations of our political duopoly, just as he did with great success on the voice and nuclear power.
David Pearl is a former Treasury assistant secretary.

The pond is content. 

Let the current agenda for change run its course, and soon enough we'll be nuking the country to save the planet, at least in the lizard Oz's collective hive mind...

And so to end with the joyous thought that at last Liberation Day is at hand, with the immortal Rowe helping usher it in ...